• Pi_r

    sorry ...with some tips it's easier ;)

    posted in technical issues read more
  • Pi_r

    hello every body, found this some where i can't remember, it was from a granular patch probably ... ... it works really great BUT would be even greater if there would be a third point of control on the envelope. Here in the patch we only have Bias and Shape. i juste can't make the math in pd hann, pd curved and so one, so i 'm asking for help.
    Can't find many example working in this way to generate envelope, did u ?
    thx for your time ++

    posted in technical issues read more
  • Pi_r

    ..with the technic from the "really usefull tuto.....meanly my probs are : i can't modify the hanning specifications (to read env shape from a array) working on each grain separetly.
    nor dynamically changing number of instances in the clone object.
    ...any ideas ?

    posted in patch~ read more
  • Pi_r

    coming back with some exemples soon :)

    posted in patch~ read more
  • Pi_r

    this is super clean ")) precise pitch.
    I'm succefully working with this patch :

    more easy to connect and synchronise with a gem video player but less "rich" than yours.
    I did try to modify your patch to fit to my plan but i can't get the video results i have with the clone object way. i also have pitch issues and over CPU use.. what do u think ?)

    posted in patch~ read more
  • Pi_r

    @weightless hey it's seems to be great but I " store.param $0 sustain" is missing
    still got it some where?

    posted in technical issues read more
  • Pi_r

    this is simply marvelous thanks so much

    posted in news read more
  • Pi_r

    Hi alexandros

    I tried that, but the thing is that the images are superimposed while in my patch with the [pix_add] the two images are superimposed but you can see both of them. That is to say here nothing.. until there is some "spatial translation" or "temporal translation". (!)
    Mainly what i'm not managing to do is to superpose one image and the same image but with the opposite colors; ..and get a black in result.
    As you can see in the "Screenshot 2014-12-06 at 13.12.23" when i use alpha] i got a gray scale. In this configuration i got one rectangle for every [gem head].
    I also joined "Capture d’écran 2014-12-06 à 12.57.18" ; where i ain’t got no gray scale but a black because here i input the two gemhead]s to a [pix_add] object and i got two [rectangle]s .
    If you can see something it’s because one image is a frame before a other frame of the same sequences. ( « a temporal translation ») .
    So in short what i looking to do in the patch « translate_one_by_one » is a
    « spatial translation » .
    A « spatial translation » between two images (and after two or more series of images.)
    i therefore need to be able to see the two images at once.
    Sorry for my bad English

    thx for your generosity


    posted in pixel# read more
  • Pi_r

    sorry but i haven't understood all of what you just aswer .. in your exemple do you render more than one thing ?
    thx again

    posted in pixel# read more

Internal error.

Oops! Looks like something went wrong!