Maybe the tutorial is older and uses table instead of array?
Also, have you checked the example file I02.Hann.window.pd?
It would help if you precise which tutorial you are trying to follow.

Hope this helps ...

Here's my go at it using only Vanilla objects, maybe it can help:

urn.pd

Sorry just realized @oid has a much better solution

Here’s a dynamic version so the same object can be used with all arithmetic operators.
It uses [else/dollsym] but that can be easily removed.
Hope this helps,
list_op.pd

Hi there, sorry for the late reply I had simply forgot about it.
I gave it a deeper look today, and it does seem like quite a job ... Most objects in my library are structured in the same way and use the ELSE externals.
In the coming months I will be working with an artist who might require the freeze patch in vanilla, if this happens I'll make sure I post it here (won't forget .
Sorry about that ...

Hi Coalman. Here's the latest version. It hasn't been tested on diferent platforms, and might be a bit harder to use as the first version was built for a friend and this one I use alone. I'd love feedback! Cheers snail_v2.0.zip

Yes, that's right.
I have a new version I can post further down if you're interested, don't hesitate if you have questions.
Best,

Hi there, thanks for the interest.
It seems you’re missing libraries “else” and “hcs”.
You’re also probably not using the latest version of Pd 0.51 as the object [pdcontrol] doesn’t load.
Hope this helps, keep me posted and have a great day

Hi there! I know it’s been 5 years, but I stumbled upon this thread and thought I’d share what I usually use as an automatic feedback killer

I guess the advantage is that it remains in the signal domain. This example uses the envelope of one signal to inversely modulate another, but using send~ / receive~ it can easily modulate itself. Hope this makes sense ...pumpin.pd

And another idea: if you're using [>=] or similar to detect threshold, make sure it's followed by a [change]?