Hi,

I am after a bit of advice regarding GEM and how to extend it using externals. Is it possible to do in the normal way (as described on the website)?

I have downloaded the entire source code for PD and GEM, in order that I can take an existing object and change it to suit my purposes, but I'm not sure how to compile it without rebuilding the entire GEM library. I was hoping it could be possible just to compile my new object as a singular entity.

The new object I need is one which is very similar to part_vertex, except that instead of generating a new particle for every render frame, I need it to only generate a particle if it receives a bang message. Maybe there is already some other way of doing it?

Hope someone can help.

Many thanks,

John.

Why can't you build a single external for GEM as a singular entity? Haven't tried to build a GEM external, but had that in mind, so I'm asking out of curiosity...

I have downloaded the entire source code for PD and GEM, in order that I can take an existing object and change it to suit my purposes, but I'm not sure how to compile it without rebuilding the entire GEM library. [url=www.braindumps.com/training/a-plus-certification-practice-test-free.htm]www.braindumps.com/training/a-plus-certification-practice-test-free.htm[/url]
I was hoping it could be possible just to compile my new object as a singular entity.

Building only one object is fairly easy (at least with linux). You have to download pd-ext source and tell your compiler where pd-ext and Gem sources are (usually down to the /src directory : put the correct paths in your makefile).