in theory by upsampling the whole process.

but in most cases you would then also need to play the input faster into it.

@ddw_music said:

I don't have the link handy, but one commentator called GPT a "mansplaining machine" -- often wrong, but projecting absolute confidence in its answers.

then it is evident: chatGPT is a politician.

@ddw_music said:

@Obineg said:

chatGPT is more intelligent than 90% of the world population

It's not. It makes up answers that sound correct, but not based on real understanding.

90% of the humans are not even able to give answers which sound correct.

that is how it is: chatGPT is more intelligent than 90% of the word population, but unfortunately that means nothing.

i mean we drive sport-offroad-cars in the city, we build houses with flat roofs, and we litter the ocean with plastic bottles, what could a machine learn from us?

a digital poles and zeros filter always offers 3 or 6 db/oct, depending on the use case, and you switch to a higher order by switches and gates which lets you choose to put filters in series or not.

this is more or less identical in both worlds.

if you actually want to use a "multiple switch" (i.e. many switches) to do that on a hardware surface is another question (you rather want to have a switch with 4 stages) but the internal logic in the circuit is always the same.

you *can *use a digital enviroment to design circuits which look *similar *to electric components, but of course one prerequisite would be that you *know *these analog components already. (and then it is questionable why you would need a computer program to simulate it?)

i am not really a pd user and i dont know which distribution has what gate and switch objects - but we can easily replace it using multiplications with 0 and 1.

this way it is even simpler to understand what happens.

@kosuke16 said: that I didn't have to learn anything

very well tracked down.

and now... build your own version.

framework:

1. first take care about what it should mean when midi note events come in. don´t forget to handle a possible third key pressed down.
2. build the trillo events to output.
3. connect the two parts.

you can learn about things, play around, make single sounds, make songs, make performance patches or build actual software "products".

the proposed "one song one patch" use case is quite common.

pd or standalone max are a bit simpler because you at least get rid of the routing chaos in ableton and roll your own in wysiwyg style.

how to code something mainly depends on what it is.

there are stereo matrix formats, there is ambisonics, there is vbap, there are other methods of cicular panning, you can just alternate between channels and treat them as 4 mono systems... what do you want to do?

code 4*5

ah, found the code tag. but you already fixed my post.

escaping each of them sounds like a lot of work. i think one can guess that $f12 was 1 times 2 - and the other are ones are not needed anyway.

yes, for signal expr~ you can use min(max()()), i copied this from my datarate max patch.

of course both is likewise difficult to read for a beginner.

outside of expr~ you might also be able to optimize the code further with pong and modulo.

but i like to start out verbose and linear, then optimize later.

he has yet to get rid of this snapshot nonsense.