I decided to try this, and was delighted that it worked:
If arbfunc~.pd is
[$1 $2]
|
[outlet~]
then you can successfully use it like
[arbfunc~ osc~ 1000]
or
[arbfunc~ phasor~ 100]
I assume this power should only be used for good.
Object names as abstraction arguments
I decided to try this, and was delighted that it worked:
If arbfunc~.pd is
[$1 $2]
|
[outlet~]
then you can successfully use it like
[arbfunc~ osc~ 1000]
or
[arbfunc~ phasor~ 100]
I assume this power should only be used for good.
Yep, it's quite good for dynamic patching. This is the magic that makes [nqpoly4~] create as many voice abstractions as you tell it to.
I didn*t use dynamic patching much; and just out of curiosity:
what is the benefit of this power-technics?
I mainly use it for two situations: where I might need multiple copies of something, but the number of copies is not predetermined; or when the order of certain things can be changed.
In the first case, one thing you could do is supply a folder full of samples to [hcs/folder_list] and dynamically generate the number of
(note to self : or finish that damn [matrix~]-based patch)
Oops! Looks like something went wrong!