-
thel
Hello forum!
I try to set up a sequencer in pd. The idea is to have a nice processing sketch where one can draw rects into a grid. The indexes and value of each field activated is sent via osc.
So pd receives something like "/note i j val", where i and j are of course the coordinates and val is the chosen value.So now I need something like a 2d array in pd that is updated with new values but traversed inside pd (for a good timing).
Do I really have to put many (j times) simple arrays?
Or is there a better/easier/handier way to solve this?Any help appreciated
thel -
thel
Hi!
What about the sinesum-message?
See here:
http://www.pd-tutorial.com/english/ch03s04.htmlChapter 3.4.3.5 Additive synthesis with array
-
thel
Hi!
I think you would have to check the bang for end of the sample (see the doc).
I always thought it was easier to do it with an array and a phasor~
-
thel
just to be sure I understand it right:
have you connected your sound to writesf~??
Connect it to the same inlet where your messages come in and it should work.
see this: -
-
-
thel
{{..and here's a small preview:}}
==> moved it to the right placethanx for your help; I need to get deeper into pd
thel -
thel
Hello back again!
Yes I'm still on it...
I built a little step-sequencer like Processing sketch to store notes in a pd-array (or two). Well, it works - far from being 'beautiful'. That's not a trivial problem in my eyes.
I really had problems to read many field from an array at once,.. and how to send them to the sound-modules? I stayed at the simplest direct connection level (instead of a list per step).
I still hope there is a more comfortable way to do this.However, maybe someone give it a try?
It's packed with Mac/Win/Linux executables, the processing source, pd-files and scores in text files so that one can just get started.