Signature
-
seb-harmonik.ar
@cfry it probably picked up [list-dripdex] which is
[list-drip]
w/ index
I think list-abs could use a rewrite using the 'new'[list]
objects..
I recommend just installing zexy and using[drip]
though.. externals will always be faster than abstractions -
-
seb-harmonik.ar
@Konked2 maybe make an attack part of the envelope.. right now it jumps up to one instantly
@lacuna good call, forgot about clear
-
seb-harmonik.ar
@Konked2 hmm.. maybe you're still missing something? here's the edited patch
or maybe there is inconsistency and my speakers aren't good enough to tell
picodrumz.pd -
seb-harmonik.ar
@Konked2 you have to connect the
[del]
to the message box that is going into[vline~]
also maybe you made a message[del(
instead of an object[del]
? -
seb-harmonik.ar
Thanks David
I think it's due to the value of the noise~ and phasor phase
Try this to fix:
you can use the [seed (message to noise~ to set a consistent set of samples from it
but, the state in the filters has to 'settle' after that, hence the[del]
but [line~] can't begin 10 samples after the block starts so[vline~]
must be usededit: actually I think 3 samples is enough delay.. 1 for each filter
not sure what the deal is on those number boxes for phase.. range should be 0-1.. -
seb-harmonik.ar
I didn't open the patch, but you don't want to multiply audio using message-rate ramp (from regular
[line]
)
use[line~]
instead
edit: I noticed you're also setting a[*~ ]
from a[/ 2]
(from the[snapshot~]
) every 50 ms. That's probably also doing some popping. Maybe a[line~]
over 50 ms instead would be appropriate? not exactly sure of the intent there -
seb-harmonik.ar
this will also be a feature for [poly] in the next pd release https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/661
-
seb-harmonik.ar
@bas-m you can move them around in edit mode. Select the leftmost part of the line with a click-an-drag. it is a canvas with a label (right-click the selection box and you can change the label from the properties)
-
seb-harmonik.ar
are you using [noteout]? that seems like it should work
What is the software you're sending to and how are you inspecting the received bytes on that end?