@alexandros & @whale-av Thanks for those good advice, from now one I will use [t b b] in order to check my patches. and i will try to simplifies the patches I'll post in order to be more readable.
Thanks for your those advice and your kindness.

@jameslo Yes you are right, but as I use a bang on every number I need, it works.

Envelope.pd

Thanks again.

Thanks jameslo
Good idea,
but even that the out put of the first expression conditional is a list of numbers as expected,
the second expression conditional just out put one zero every time.
But if I enter two messages [1( & [2( in order to check the output, it works just fine.
I really don’t understand this behavior...

Edit: Sorry jameslo I just forgot to bang the second expression so it gave me just the first number witch is always zero.
Once again sorry.

Hi,
I’m puzzled by a conditional expression that doesn't work at all.
My purpose is to make changing envelope for a granular experimentation.
I have try multiples ways to write it, nothing seams to work correctly.
This is the selected condition :

Condition.pd
If you could help me to resolve this problem or redirect me to a post where this kind of problem was solved, I will be glad. Thank you.

Sorry for my mistake, as my Linux MobMuPlat Editor seams not to work correctly it give me false info. On my smartphone the tuples are send correctly as a number of samples...
So it's quit easy to set up the good speed ratio.
Once again, sorry for this mistake.

Hello, I am a new comer on this site, a beginner in PD & in ModMuPlat.
My question is about the way to use the range of a /Table in PD :
MobMuPlat seams to send series of 12 tuples -1 -1 ,as it’s always the same info, I can’t understand how it works.
But it works as shown in the example (MMPExamples-TableGlitch-ip5.mmp).
The problem is that if you select a part of the table, only this part will be reed and that that’s, of course find, but the sample rate of the [phasor~] is not changing accordingly so as the selection is shorter than the table everything is slowing-down...And that’s not find.

I hope I was clear enough in my explanation and my purpose.
In advance thanks for your responses.