Hi all!
Problem solved. It is about RG indeed and not exactly a problem. Nevertheless, below, I register the resolution given by Julie S. (and Mr. Cannam as well) from RG list:
[ quote
de Julie S <msjulie_s@yahoo.com>
para rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
Alexandre Reche e Silva <alereche@gmail.com>
data 17 de fevereiro de 2011 22:32
assunto Re: [Rosegarden-user] Puredata Rosegarden connection through Jack
enviado por yahoo.com
assinado por yahoo.com
ocultar detalhes 22:32 (18 horas atrás)
Hello ARS
I bet there is a simple fix.
* Select track 1
In Track Parameters:
Select Recording Filters->Channel: 1
* Select Track 2
In Track Parameters:
Select Recording FIlters->Channel: 2
Try that and see if there is joy.
Sincerely,
Julie S.
--- On Thu, 2/17/11, Alexandre Reche e Silva <alereche@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Alexandre Reche e Silva <alereche@gmail.com>
Subject: [Rosegarden-user] Puredata Rosegarden connection through Jack
To: rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2011, 9:54 AM
- Ocultar texto das mensagens anteriores -
Hi.
I made a patch in Puredata (PD) which sends midi outputs through the channels 1 and 2, i. e., [noteout 1] and [noteout 2].
I try to record them in Rosegarden (RG), but the two midi channels of PD are sent to the same midi channel of the RG, as it seems.
I checked the connections again and attached a snapshot for you to take a look, because until now the two tracks of the RG record the two PD midi channels together.
All I want is to record them separately in each track of RG.
Regards,
a r s
PS: Unlike OpenMusic, PD hasn't an object to depict musical notation. Many of us use RG for this purpose as well. It will be nice to have this issue resolved and archived here on the list. Tnx.
end of quote]
http://www.pdpatchrepo.info/hurleur/PD-RG_connection-fix.jpeg
The more we think we know about the greater the unknown (Neil Peart)