<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Stumbling over simple pd code]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I had made a simple patch a few days ago that used a shuffle object to generate numbers, it sent to a t b f, which then fed into a metro object.</p>
<p>bang<br />
|<br />
[shuffle 200 700]<br />
|<br />
[t b f]<br />
^<br />
[metro]<br />
(metro loops back to bang on top)</p>
<p>There was slightly more to it than these three objects, though, but it fully worked and created an irregular metro pulse that had a &quot;generative&quot; feel.</p>
<p>Now, when I try to use it (with just those three objects) the patch goes into stack overflow and shuts down.</p>
<p>I know I didn't have much more than that code, and it worked great. In a fit of hubris, I thought I would remember something so simple:(</p>
<p>What is a simple way to use the shuffle object to generate the metro pulse's time, while not going into overflow?</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/9866/stumbling-over-simple-pd-code</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:32:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/9866.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:16:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stumbling over simple pd code on Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:18:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I had made a simple patch a few days ago that used a shuffle object to generate numbers, it sent to a t b f, which then fed into a metro object.</p>
<p>bang<br />
|<br />
[shuffle 200 700]<br />
|<br />
[t b f]<br />
^<br />
[metro]<br />
(metro loops back to bang on top)</p>
<p>There was slightly more to it than these three objects, though, but it fully worked and created an irregular metro pulse that had a &quot;generative&quot; feel.</p>
<p>Now, when I try to use it (with just those three objects) the patch goes into stack overflow and shuts down.</p>
<p>I know I didn't have much more than that code, and it worked great. In a fit of hubris, I thought I would remember something so simple:(</p>
<p>What is a simple way to use the shuffle object to generate the metro pulse's time, while not going into overflow?</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/9866/stumbling-over-simple-pd-code</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/9866/stumbling-over-simple-pd-code</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gummi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:18:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stumbling over simple pd code on Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:09:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-a" href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/user/gummi">@gummi</a> Hello Gummi.<br />
You can often fix stack overflows with a delay, so that the loop is long enough.<br />
This works.....<a href="/uploads/files/1456650455878-shuffle_fix.pd">shuffle_fix.pd</a><br />
but in fact you don't need the metro as it will bang after the &quot;shuffle time&quot; and the delay does exactly the same.........<br />
<a href="/uploads/files/1456650527690-shuffle_fix2.pd">shuffle_fix2.pd</a><br />
David.<br />
<img src="/uploads/files/1456650546285-shuff.jpg" alt="shuff.JPG" class="img-responsive img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/9866/stumbling-over-simple-pd-code/2</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/9866/stumbling-over-simple-pd-code/2</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[whale-av]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:09:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>