<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[72-TET algorithmic IDM]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><div class="embed-container"><iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/d4t5B6nPQGg" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe></div></p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:26:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:41:02 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:41:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><div class="embed-container"><iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/d4t5B6nPQGg" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe></div></p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:41:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:00:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! Is there a patch available?</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/2</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/2</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ricky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:00:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:06:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is very cool acreil... Those harmonies are simple amazing. Do you perform live with this?</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/3</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/3</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[domien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:06:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:09:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>superb!</p>
<p>if you can do requests, i'd love to hear a beatless ambient version - basically like that end section, but for 10 minutes</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/4</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/4</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:09:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:04:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the delay; I've been out of town (AES conference in Denver) and generally busy with work. I'd like to share at least parts of the patch once I get it more refined. The chord/scale navigation is the interesting part, but I need to work on it more.</p>
<p>I haven't performed live but I'd like to do some sound installation type stuff with it.</p>
<p>And I can mix a beatless version since I rendered it to multiple tracks. That will be easy...</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/5</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/5</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:04:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Tue, 19 Jun 2012 04:20:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>please! your beats are great too, but i'd just like to hear the whole thing without them</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/6</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/6</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 04:20:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:37:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-a" href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/user/mod">@mod</a> said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>please! your beats are great too, but i'd just like to hear the whole thing without them</p>
</blockquote>
<p>with the bass or not?</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/7</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/7</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:37:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:50:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>yeah leave the bass</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/8</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/8</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:50:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:18:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Could you share the reverb or the FM bass abstraction? This is a great patch. The FM bass is especially tasty.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/9</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/9</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:18:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:50:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/?78xd7xagdhy6wmm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediafire.com/?78xd7xagdhy6wmm</a></p>
<p>Here's the mix without the drums. I'd like to make something else along these lines, but I'd rather start from scratch and try something different.</p>
<p>I've attached the reverb too. It implements the Lexicon 224 concert hall algorithm (with some modifications and enhancements), as described here: <a href="http://www.convexoptimization.com/wikimization/index.php/Dattorro_Convex_Optimization_of_a_Reverberator" rel="nofollow">http://www.convexoptimization.com/wikimization/index.php/Dattorro_Convex_Optimization_of_a_Reverberator</a></p>
<p>I've posted it here before. I need to make it more intuitive to use, and permit external control, but I haven't gotten around to it. I can use it well enough, but I think others will find it confusing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pdpatchrepo.info/hurleur/reverbCH.zip" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdpatchrepo.info/hurleur/reverbCH.zip</a></p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/10</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/10</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:50:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:09:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here's the bass part. I used Stutter's [euclid] abstraction, but repackaged it in a way that permits easy polyrhythms. I'll probably make some further changes to it at some point.</p>
<p>The basic idea is that the different notes triggered (and they're fixed here, just for simplicity) also randomly change a different subset of the FM parameters. That way the sounds are different from note to note, but not completely unrelated. I basically recycled it from the example I posted on the FM feedback thread...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pdpatchrepo.info/hurleur/i2a_fm.zip" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdpatchrepo.info/hurleur/i2a_fm.zip</a></p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/11</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/11</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:09:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:06:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>These are great. Do you use Reaktor any? It would be cool to see a core translation of this FM tone generator. The use of tables here is interesting and a bit confusing.</p>
<p>That reverb blows my mind. Congrats.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/12</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/12</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:06:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:01:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I haven't used Reaktor since about 2005. The tables are for the FM feedback. It implements Yamaha patent 4249447.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/13</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/13</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:01:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:33:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>thanks so much acreil for all your effort in responding to our noisy requests!</p>
<p>big round of applause for your hard work and great sounds.</p>
<p>:0)</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/14</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/14</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:33:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:30:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Yessir! Fantastic. Many, many, thanks.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/15</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/15</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[purchase]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:30:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Tue, 03 Jul 2012 23:48:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Yep, great!</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/16</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/16</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ricky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 23:48:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:57:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>awesome sounds</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/17</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/17</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[unfug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:57:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:17:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah! Thanks for pleasing my ears!!<br />
I'm always happy to hear something actually being made with pd.. especially if it's good.<br />
..leave that beat... <img class="emoji emoji-extended" src="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji-extended/images/wink.png" title=";)" alt=";)" /></p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/18</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/18</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flipp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:17:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:52:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-a" href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/user/acreil">@acreil</a> said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I've attached the reverb too. It implements the Lexicon 224 concert hall algorithm (with some modifications and enhancements), as described here: <a href="http://www.convexoptimization.com/wikimization/index.php/Dattorro_Convex_Optimization_of_a_Reverberator" rel="nofollow">http://www.convexoptimization.com/wikimization/index.php/Dattorro_Convex_Optimization_of_a_Reverberator</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh my gosh.. That's one of the highest quality reverbs I've heard (surely in pd). What do you mean by &quot;Lexicon 224 concert hall algorithm&quot;? Is it one &quot;preset&quot; of lexicon 224? Or was it a specific device implementing it?</p>
<p>I'm curious about the way you implemented the many elements shown in the Datorro diagram (allpass, delays) and the feedback lines.<br />
Question: can we use your patch (giving proper credits, of course?)</p>
<p><a class="plugin-mentions-a" href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/user/acreil">@acreil</a> said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I've posted it here before. I need to make it more intuitive to use, and permit external control, but I haven't gotten around to it. I can use it well enough, but I think others will find it confusing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I completely missed that one. Yes, giving high level controls would be nice.<br />
Lexicon 224 was a terrific device (I just remember the Blade Runner intro by Vangelis, the huge spacey sounds).</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing it.</p>
<p>Alberto</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/19</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/19</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[AlbertoZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:52:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:30:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The 224 had a pretty large number of different algorithms. These weren't just presets, they were different topologies. Dattorro described another (or at least something similar) in his well known AES paper.</p>
<p>The thing is, I don't know how the user adjustable parameters of the 224 mapped to the actual coefficients, etc. I've changed a few things to make it more to my liking. But for this topology I think there's not even a way to derive an accurate RT60 control...</p>
<p>Anyway, feel free to use it.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/20</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/20</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:30:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:14:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hey acreil, I just wante to say that your works have really inspired me to get into pd more.<br />
Also thanks for the reverb, I have a feeling I'll be using it a lot.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/21</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/21</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[drekmajster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:14:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sat, 30 Mar 2013 03:56:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Acreil - thanks SO much for that reverb abstraction. Amazing work. I came across some youtube videos of yours, and an extensive and interesting gearslutz verb design thread, in my hunt for a seriously good reverb algorithm for pd - and finally I found this thread with your patch. I'm excited to see what you come up with next - do you have a website where you post your code? Or a github account?</p>
<p>I can't state enough how great it is to finally have good algo verb in pd.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/22</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/22</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jmejia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 03:56:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sat, 30 Mar 2013 05:10:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I should have better reverbs soon-ish. They should be more usable. I really need to get a blog together for this stuff, but I haven't done it yet...</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/23</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/23</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 05:10:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:29:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! Looking forward to seeing what you create!</p>
<p>In the meantime - could you extend a few useful pointers for getting control over this path? Is there a handful (list?) of parameters that I could globally control to effect decay time?</p>
<p>Also I see a ton of $1 objects but they aren't being found - ex:<br />
error: 0-prl: no such object<br />
error: 0-prr: no such object<br />
error: 0-gscale: no such object<br />
error: 0-ldiff2: no such object<br />
error: 0-ldiff2o: no such object<br />
error: 0-ldiff1: no such object</p>
<p>Though I may not have the latest version...</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/24</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/24</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jmejia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:29:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:59:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I think you're getting the errors after clicking the message box, right? They're actually local $0 objects, but the message box interprets $ as referring to incoming list elements. So you should click the bang instead, which sends [f $0] to the message box.</p>
<p>This wasn't really designed with good coding practices or usability in mind, so these message boxes should probably be hidden away; I just made everything visible so the &quot;preset&quot; parameters can be edited manually. The new one I'm working on has an inlet that can be used to externally control parameters, but I was too lazy for that when I did this. I could add that without much trouble, but the parameter names aren't particularly well chosen...</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/25</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/25</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acreil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:59:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sun, 07 Apr 2013 00:09:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ahh gotcha - yeah that makes sense. Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/26</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/26</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jmejia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 00:09:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 72-TET algorithmic IDM on Sun, 26 May 2013 20:36:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Just a bump.. hoping for an updated/friendlier reverb patch from you!!</p>
<p>Having a good time with this one for sure.. but devising an RT60 control for it is alluding me.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/27</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6371/72-tet-algorithmic-idm/27</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jmejia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 20:36:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>