<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Best Linux for PD?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I have an old laptop that is not being used. Currently a windows 2000 machine with Pentium 3 256mg ram.</p>
<p>I there a certain type of Linux that works best for A/V stuff. I plan to basically just run PD on it for now.</p>
<p>Any helpful hint on the Linux switch is also appreciated since I don't know anything about the platform.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:21:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:15:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Linux for PD? on Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:15:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I have an old laptop that is not being used. Currently a windows 2000 machine with Pentium 3 256mg ram.</p>
<p>I there a certain type of Linux that works best for A/V stuff. I plan to basically just run PD on it for now.</p>
<p>Any helpful hint on the Linux switch is also appreciated since I don't know anything about the platform.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon2211]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:15:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Linux for PD? on Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:19:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone seems to be using Ubuntu Studio , so it's a good choice for the support.</p>
<p>If that's too heavy for the machine try Pure::Dyne</p>
<p>(both have live distros, so you can try before you install)</p>
<p>a.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd/2</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd/2</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[obiwannabe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:19:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Linux for PD? on Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:11:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Also try Musix<br />
<a href="http://musix.org.ar/en/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://musix.org.ar/en/index.html</a></p>
<p>My personal 2 pence on Pure::Dyne is that it's great as a CD distro but bit tricky once installed.</p>
<p>Both have a collection of awesome software included for A/V.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd/3</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd/3</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lead]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:11:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Linux for PD? on Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:26:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Install Feisty, using alternative - 7.04 worked great for me. Install the studio, test the slow kernel first on your machine - try the optimised later, if all goes well.<br />
(I tried an update to 7.10, and to optimise on my 386mhz 256mb hp portable, and it really slowed things down! I have looked into RAM - the upgrade is worth it if you live in the US - 90 dollars, and you'll have your 1 gig of RAM -2 512 bars - it will make a huge difference!!)</p>
<p>Hands down, for simplicity, use Hans' extended-PD for Ubuntu. Working better than ever, and fun to see how much works compared to 1.4 years ago when I started.<br />
Hans installation works great - if not, Miller's stripped down PD is available through Synaptic, their package manager. (don't forget to first install all the required libraries, which might all be included in their new Studio version</p>
<p>But don't stop there.... <img class="emoji emoji-extended" src="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji-extended/images/wink.png" title=";)" alt=";)" /></p>
<p>If you nest Dynebolic on Ubuntu, (check nesting on the Dyne site - it really is cool!) you get a very light and easy PD if you copy the pure:dyne modules with it. I have found it to be very fast, but the actual Pure:Dyne CD, unfortunately, did not boot on my elderly beast. So I have been happy to open PD on Dyne:bolic, using a CD to boot into it - taking advantage of the supersmall system, and PD - except that all the extras/libraries in PD, taken from the PureDyne distro, were not functional!!!</p>
<p>Sound familiar - ahh, like two years ago, when half the extended were not working...<br />
But you have Ubuntu extended as a great refernce of proper functioning...</p>
<p>I really do think nesting is a great solution, letting one hack away on a less stable or smaller distro with a larger one. Plus, I can pass patches back and forth.</p>
<p>New forks off this question:<br />
I just need to check if I can just copy Hans extended to Dyne??? Or better suggestions??<br />
How about PD with DSL?</p>
<p>And Has anyone done a powerpc linux nesting on OSX.3 or OSx.4? I have found that Debian's live does boot on powerpc (g4, 1 gig ram), as does ubuntu's. After the speed up I saw with Dyne nesting, I thought - someone much smarter and better at programming than I who doesn't want VM slowdowns has probably developed a nesting solution for linux on mac.</p>
<p>By the way, as a fan of the CREB library for PD, almost all of it is functioing on the Ubuntu distro - great work Hans!!</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd/4</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/1615/best-linux-for-pd/4</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[puredummy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:26:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>