<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Purr Data: GUI, and parallel processing]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I was curious about a few technical points of Purr Data. I know you can run multiple instances in parallel with the unique flag, but can they still communicate? Also, was the Pd~ object ever worked out, or have there been updates to parallel processing?</p>
<p>Aside from that, I was also wondering about the GUI. I read that Purr does utilize multiple cpu cores, but is it still treated as a seperate program? With vanilla, you can SSH between Pd and the GUI running on seperate machines.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/11452/purr-data-gui-and-parallel-processing</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 05:43:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/11452.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 08:59:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Purr Data: GUI, and parallel processing on Sat, 16 Jun 2018 08:59:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I was curious about a few technical points of Purr Data. I know you can run multiple instances in parallel with the unique flag, but can they still communicate? Also, was the Pd~ object ever worked out, or have there been updates to parallel processing?</p>
<p>Aside from that, I was also wondering about the GUI. I read that Purr does utilize multiple cpu cores, but is it still treated as a seperate program? With vanilla, you can SSH between Pd and the GUI running on seperate machines.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/11452/purr-data-gui-and-parallel-processing</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/11452/purr-data-gui-and-parallel-processing</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[not.tachyons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 08:59:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Purr Data: GUI, and parallel processing on Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:41:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-a" href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/user/not-tachyons">@not.tachyons</a> said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I was curious about a few technical points of Purr Data. I know you can run multiple instances in parallel with the unique flag, but can they still communicate?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, they can communicate the same way you would in Pd Vanilla.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Also, was the Pd~ object ever worked out, or have there been updates to parallel processing?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There's a bug that should be fixed in the next release when using the &quot;-nogui&quot; flag with <code>[pd~]</code>. But other than that <code>[pd~]</code> should work.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Aside from that, I was also wondering about the GUI. I read that Purr does utilize multiple cpu cores, but is it still treated as a seperate program?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes it is.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>With vanilla, you can SSH between Pd and the GUI running on seperate machines.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I suppose you can do that with Purr Data with an SSH<br />
tunnel, but I've never done it.</p>
<p>Also, the file dialogs would run on the GUI machine as I assume they do in Pd Vanilla, too.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/11452/purr-data-gui-and-parallel-processing/2</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/11452/purr-data-gui-and-parallel-processing/2</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jancsika]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:41:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>